Twitter is an online social networking and microblogging service that allows users to send and read short 140-character messages called "tweets". It was founded in 2006, and has since become one of the most popular social media platforms for communication and sharing. Twitter is an easy way to share ideas, news, and opinions with other people. It is a great tool for keeping up with friends, family, and colleagues. It also allows users to follow people, organizations, and news sources. This gives users access to a wide range of interesting and useful information. Twitter is not just a way to communicate with friends, family, and colleagues. It is also a powerful marketing tool. Companies and organizations can use Twitter to reach out to their target audiences, share information, and build relationships with potential customers. Twitter can also be used to connect with people in creative and interesting ways. For example, users can join conversations on topics they are passionate about, participate in Twitter polls, or even join in on live events. In conclusion, Twitter is a popular social media platform that allows users to stay connected with friends, family, and colleagues, as well as access a wide range of interesting and useful information. It is also a powerful marketing tool for businesses and organizations.
Free.non-commercial.no shadow bans or censorship of views.
I like how I can say what I want and ppl can silence me.
Larger character limit and no corporate censorship.
The experience is entirely up to the user. If one doesn't want to see certain content, hear from certain people or avoid certain topics, it's up to them to shape that experience, not a nebulous group of people.
The video upload function, without ads, and as a true social networking platform, does not regulate the speech of its users.
Freedom of speech, nice people and the mute button work on those you don't like. What is not to like.
No corporate censorship. Like Big Tech® ™? Censor and deplatform more users for the slightest of infractions, Gab will grow. It has its problems (the UI needs improvements, it needs a "media" tab like Twitter has). I've had my account for two years. Not a single block, suspension or forced deletion of my posts. I'm done with Twitter.
It's an alt free language for Twitter. However, do NOT join if you are easily offended. Lots of trolls (since it's a free speech platform). Other than that, much more flexible than Twitter.
The 250-character limit allows for more thoughtful engagement. The quote gabs feature makes it easy to connect complex content. The free speech ethic attracts creative and original thinkers. Interestingly, it also attracts a nicer, more polite group of users.
Better overall design and freedom from censorship.
Twitter probably has a better user interface, but you can't be part of Twitter unless you're a converged SJW. Freedom of speech reigns supreme in Gab. If it's legal it stays.
A reliable platform that does not prohibit people from making offensive speeches ... speak freely is its motto. There are no ads, and you can speak your mind freely without fear of being suspended, and unbiased developers control the statistics. As long as you follow the few simple guidelines that avoid bots, parody sites and abuse of fake accounts, you can speak freely without retribution.
Gab has a strong commitment to ensuring freedom of expression for its users. It is continually improving its usability and has a growing user base. Unlike Twitter, you get 300 characters, the ability to reject posts and no ads. It's like Twitter before Jack became CEO again and started shadowing, de-verifying and banning certain users for their politics.
Gab does not ban or suspend your account for wrong thinking.
Much better than Twitter because they don't censor people's posts. Twitter thinks we're children who can't make up our own minds, so they're a babysitter that watches everything you say. Gab, on the other hand, gives you unedited information from the real world and lets you decide. i love it!
Gab is much more than an "alternative" to Twitter. Because Twitter only allows the narrative that the company sees as desirable. Thus, the level of information became poorer and poorer over time. To make matters worse, they disguise their rules to enforce them despotically.
I've been using Gab for about 2 years, I love it! It is uncensored, so you need to have a backbone and the ability to survive without nannies. But it's worth the time and effort because you don't have to worry about criminals shutting you down.
There is no censorship or shadowing, unlike its Twitter and Facebook counterparts. No ads besides that, plus the ability to support content creators directly on the platform with the subscription feature. A platform so good, Apple and Google's app stores don't want a bar.
Prohibition of the shadow or restriction of legitimate freedom of expression (censorship).
No shadowbanning, no censorship of legal speech. Bots are dealt with quickly. They do not sell your data.
It is reasonably easy to use. And it is independent. It is pro free speech and not connected to a totalitarian regime like VK.
Freedom of expression. Constantly evolving user interface. Good people who don't tell you what to think. growing SUPER FAST! Come on!
The vast majority of Gabbers are adults in the room with a vocabulary that is larger than most trolls on the World Wide Web. Free to discuss topics openly and the ability to block users who are abusive by their own free will and agreement. Gab is the future NOW!
No hay censura. Sin shadowbanning.
Gab is ad-free. It gives people the opportunity to earn money by offering premium content. It does not track your every move in the app. It does not censor you unnecessarily. It gives you the option to mute users who try to trick you. Gab offers a professional subscription that self-sustains the platform without the need for advertisers to dictate the direction of the site's development.
They do not censor right-wingers.
Small and friendly alternative to that gianormous Silicon Valley app. Censorship free and proud of it!
It is not anti-white and does not censor freedom of expression!
It's fantastic, it's fast, I see what I want and hide what I don't. I've never experienced a single error other than clicking on Twitter links to gab and I'm sure it's not gab.
Freedom of expression, you can publish anything!
Platform for real freedom of expression that is a playground for ideas.
Freedom of expression. Good app Good design
Gab allows free speech and is an inclusive community for all opinions.
Gab practices # 1A and there are no safe spaces, as there should be, as there are tools to handle things that may be offensive to someone.
Gab is more like Reddit than Twitter.
It has a different set of features: a voting system on links similar to Reddit.
Gab is the right-wing extremist publishing platform. It is in no way comparable to Twitter, except perhaps on a technical level.
It's a lot like Twitter with a 500 character limit, except there is no *site* you have to trust, but you can choose the mastodon server ("instance") you trust and they are linked, so you can follow people from other instances. All instances have their own rules, so you can choose a site with as few or as many rules as you are comfortable with.
So far, it is the most "twitter-like" as the others mentioned, while it also has a sleek and nice user interface. However, it has a lot of strict rules about what I can post and what I can't. Other than that it looks decent
Mastodon takes what's good about Twitter, adds good moderation and is decentralized and hate-free. If you just want to share your life or your thoughts, this is the place. The 500 character limit is also very useful, as well as cases for certain communities and common interests.
Use the W3C standard ActivityPub protocol ... that's the future. Don't bother with any social networking service that doesn't support it. It's like real email vs. the rude gardens of AOL's past. Mastodon and the open ActivityPub vs. closed / controlled Twitter.
It's like Twitter, but minus the things you don't like, and improved. It introduces instances, which are connected but are their own separate site with their own rules and moderation, has a 500 character limit per toot, and most instances have an amazing community from what I can tell. It's honestly the best alternative to Twitter.
A decentralized community, mostly nice, friendlier than other FOSS microblogging platforms. Perfect for me.
Mastodon really feels like Twitter, minus the bad moderation.
It's free and open source, especially if you want full control over moderation.
Much warmer community than Twitter. Even without followers, people can see your stuff and interact with you. It takes some getting used to as it's a bit different from Twitter, but stick with it and you'll love it.
Decentralized and free with many networking possibilities in fediverse through activitypub
Just like Twitter, but decentralized and ad-free with a couple of additional features. In addition to its actually open source
It's open source, distributed, fun.
It's free, OpenSource, you can filter what you want to see better. Federated
UI/UX very similar to Twitter and many different instances, making it easy to find one that fits your personal preferences.
I can do everything on Minds that I can do on Twitter without censorship!
Minds is a good alternative to Twitter because it doesn't have the baggage that comes with Twitter's many moderation problems. Minds has a much more transparent policy where the things you post are visible to other people. Minds is, hands down, the best personal alternative to Twitter functions without the censorship of dissenting opinion buffs.
Free speech and includes many Facebook and YouTube features in one platform.
It is a FB, Twitter and youtube in one.
No censorship, no free speech, no interfering governments. It's still beta, but functional. And it's growing fast.
Therefore, there is no arbitrary, hypocritical, officious biased moderation of free speech for corporate self-gratification that elects itself to moral superiority (however hypocritical, no criticism of Israel is allowed) among the self-selected Chosen Ones of the modern neo-Marxist Cult Mind.
More than one Alt for Facebook. Great site 100 times better than facebook.
Uncensored, unshaded, etc.
No censorship, no constant ads from corporate scum, no SJW agenda, no agenda really, fantastic community, lots of civil discourse.
Diaspora is a Facebook alternative, not like Twitter.
Diaspora makes great use of hashtags and has a large user base with many established instances. It also allows a person to have an account there but connect through other platforms such as GNUSocial, Friendica and Hubzilla.
Because you can write whatever you want and you won't be banned!
Facebook is not a microblogging platform.
Agree ... is not used for the same purpose.
Facebook is a corporate money maker. Partial. Liberal ad nauseam. Not at all open-minded. In the government's pocket.
It is very similar to twitter, but it is decentralized. In many cases, the number of characters is larger, which is good.
The problem is that Twitter does not preserve your privacy when you Tweet. First, all your connections, who you follow and what you like or retweet is used to profile you. Secondly, all information about you can be quoted very easily. Twister is an alternative that preserves your privacy and distributes information in a way that is not centralized for one person/company to give to others.
Twitter-like interface, interfaces with Fediverse, better moderation tools than Mastodon.
Patchwork is a decentralized messaging platform where your computer networks have the same topology as your social networks.
Patchwork the p2p social network is actively used and growing rapidly. The "Patchwork" client is being replaced by newer clients, such as patchwork-next.
With its tag system for categories, it is a good alternative for the search of interests to follow.
Discontinued has not been updated since 2015. Source: https://github.com/Libertree/libertree
By Francewhoa · Jan 2018
Realmente NO confío en Twitter. ¿Por qué? Bueno, porque antes de comenzar a usar cualquier herramienta, hago una investigación sobre sus comportamientos, desafíos, fortalezas. Después de usar Twitter durante años, el siguiente es un resumen de mis descubrimientos acerca de por qué realmente NO confío en Twitter. Lo malo • Prohibición de las sombras. Lo cual es muy poco ético. Si no estás familiarizado con la "prohibición de la sombra", significa que Twitter te prohíbe, pero no sabes que te prohibieron porque sigues publicando. Pero nadie ve tu contenido. Abhinav Vadrevu, ex ingeniero de software de Twitter fue captado en un video que decía esto en https://youtu.be/64gTjdUrDFQ?t=25s • Posición baja. Si no está familiarizado con el "rango descendente", significa que Twitter intenta que no aparezca en los resultados de búsqueda.
Olind Hassan, Director de Políticas de Twitter fue captado en un video que dice esto https://youtu.be/64gTjdUrDFQ?t=1m22s • Twitter se presenta como políticamente neutral. Pero ellos NO se comportan así. En cambio, muchos miembros del personal de Twitter realizan objetivos políticos, sesgos, promueven una agenda política y censuran su contenido si no están de acuerdo con él. Fuente en https://youtu.be/64gTjdUrDFQ • Se derrumban fácilmente en el gobierno de los EE. UU. Que con frecuencia y repetidamente pide a Twitter que censure el contenido del usuario. Pranay Singh, Ingeniero de Mensajería Directa en Twitter fue capturado en un video que decía esto https://youtu.be/64gTjdUrDFQ?t=6m23s Fuente alternativa en https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/01/11/undercover-video- Twitter-ingenieros-a-ban-una-manera-de-hablar-a través de la sombra-banning-algoritmos-a-censurar-opuestas-políticas-opiniones / • Potencialmente no es seguro.
Porque el código no está disponible públicamente. Por eso no puede ser revisado por el público. En otras palabras, existe el riesgo de abuso. • Es propiedad de una corporación con fines de lucro. No es propiedad de una comunidad sin fines de lucro. Por lo general, una prioridad de la corporación es acumular dinero. No te sirve y protege tu privacidad. Lo bueno • Ninguno Podría pensar en Notas • Si necesita libertad de expresión, apertura, diversidad, podría estar interesado en considerar alternativas. Como https://Minds.com o https://DiasporaFoundation.org
GAB does not censor free speech, but allows users to mute users/content themselves. Superior to corporate censorship.